ISLAMABAD: The Chief Justice has remarked that the court is being accused of not making a decision, how can one give a unilateral decision?
A five-member larger bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial heard the case of Speaker Rolling Suicide Note.
The Chief Justice said that try to resolve the issue politically, the court is being accused of not making a decision, how can one give a unilateral decision?
PTI lawyer Babar Awan, while giving arguments, said that he was grateful to the court for taking notice of the nation's kindness. Issue a short order, the decision of the British court quoted in the case does not apply in the case, what happened in Sindh House and Awari Hotel Lahore can be ignored?
The Chief Justice said that where are the minutes of the National Security Council meeting, there are apparent allegations in the rolling of the Deputy Speaker, there is no finding, can the Speaker give such rolling without revealing the facts? This is the constitutional point on which the court has to decide, can the Speaker go beyond Article 95 with a rolling that is not on the agenda, the Deputy Speaker has concluded in the rolling, on what content the Deputy Speaker exercised his authority We have to see if the Speaker has the power to deviate from the agenda in the House and go to any facts, if there is any such material. Is there a constitutional way to sideline it? You also want to know, before making a decision, what is the conspiracy behind the rolling.
Babar Awan said that the diplomat conveyed the message of the National Security Council of the other country to three persons. The message was conveyed to the Head of Mission, Deputy Head of Mission and Defense Attach through the embassy The message came, our Foreign Office is looking into it.
Intervening on the occasion, the Attorney General said that it is a matter of foreign policy, I do not want it to come from a political party. The Chief Justice said that the point of the Attorney General is also correct, we also do not want to get involved in foreign policy matters.
The election of the Chief Minister must be in accordance with the Constitution. We will get the update of the Punjab Assembly tomorrow, Chief Justice
Babar Awan asked if some things could be in the camera. I would like to put before the court the briefing given by the Foreign Office. The court rejected Babar Awan's request for in-camera briefing.
Lawyer PTI said that four things came to light in the letter. The Foreign Office, after seeing the letter, had a meeting with the Prime Minister and Foreign Minister. I am talking in gestures. If the no-confidence motion is not successful, then there is a dash dash. If the no-confidence motion is successful, then all is well.
Babar Awan, while presenting the conversation of the Pakistan Army spokesman on private TV in the court, said that the Pakistan Army spokesman said that he agreed with the declaration of the National Security Committee meeting.
Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan asked what was the decision of the Cabinet on the briefing of Foreign Ministry. Justice Jamal Mandokhel remarked that no doubt every citizen should be loyal to the state, what action was taken against those who were accused.
Babar Awan replied that the government did not take any action against him, the Prime Minister and the Cabinet acted cautiously.
Justice Jamal Mandokhel said that if Imran Khan wanted to form a commission, it meant that he did not know who was involved. Babar Awan replied that the Prime Minister does not want to speak in the national interest, the Prime Minister is not an investigator so this work should be left to the people concerned.
Post a Comment